data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Mac mini 2010 ram"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b25/b0b253e4847f49091075003e4a13f30cc335320d" alt="mac mini 2010 ram mac mini 2010 ram"
The Mac mini is absolutely begging to have an SSD, and unlike the rest of Apple’s Mac lineup, one isn’t even offered on the mini. To Apple’s credit, OS X does a good job of caching frequently used data but without enough RAM this is a wobbly crutch. The drive keeps power consumption and noise down to a minimum, while being awful for performance.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a9c/b8a9c4be70d9abb2e36faa1e7452f1554735dc48" alt="mac mini 2010 ram mac mini 2010 ram"
The second is the hard drive.Īpple ships the Mac mini with a 2.5” 5400RPM notebook drive. Even light multitasking exposes this weakness.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79159/79159a6f3ff4b2d2a043e0acaddb4c92ded31a07" alt="mac mini 2010 ram mac mini 2010 ram"
The first is memory, and I’ll touch on this in more detail later, but 2GB of RAM is simply not sufficient for a computer running a heavyweight OS. There are two problems with the overall performance of the mini that will contribute to it feeling slow, particularly over time. Given that Apple’s iPad is fast enough for many users today, I don’t think it’s too difficult to understand that the 2010 Mac mini is sufficient for most needs. The original Mac mini was fast enough for the entry level Mac user back in 2005.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60a3c/60a3cbcf31a0393aaa5e7eb6beb5d952bbf72803" alt="Mac mini 2010 ram"